Jasper Boykin from Atlanta, Georgia Subject of FINRA Complaint
Have you lost money with financial advisor Jasper Boykin of Atlanta, Georgia? We are investigating allegations made by FINRA (the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority), against Jasper E. Boykin, Jr. FINRA filed a complaint against Jasper Boykin after he failed to respond to an investigation. FINRA was investigating Boykin after he was terminated by his former brokerage firm, MetLife Securities, for engaging in undisclosed outside business activities. The investigation involved alleged investments in a bank.
Jasper Boykin was a financial advisor and registered representative of MetLife Securities from April 2015 to April 2016. He also was affiliated with Quest Capital Strategies from December 2013 to January 2015. He worked at a branch office in Atlanta, Georgia.
Brokerage firms like MetLife Securities have a responsibility to adequately supervise all representatives who are registered through their firm. Brokerage firms also must take steps to ensure that their financial advisors follow all securities rules and regulations, as well as internal firm policies. When brokerage firms fail to adequately supervise their registered representatives, they may be liable for investment losses sustained by customers.
Israels & Neuman PLC is a securities and investment fraud law firm with offices in Denver, Colorado; and the Seattle area. We represent investors in FINRA arbitration proceedings in all 50 states, including investors in Georgia and throughout the greater Atlanta area. Our attorneys have represented over one thousand investors against many brokerage firms in the past, including MetLife Securities.
Click to view: Boykin, Jasper FINRA Complaint
Click to view: Boykin, Jasper BrokerCheck 10.17.17
If you lost money with Jasper Boykin or MetLife Securities, please Contact Us at 720-599-3505 for a free evaluation of your case.
Israels & Neuman, PLC is a private law firm and is not affiliated with any government or law enforcement agency. Any investigation referenced in this blog is independent in nature and is being conducted by our law firm privately, not in conjunction with any government or law enforcement agency. All information contained in this blog should be deemed statements of opinion derived from the author’s review of public records, not statements of fact. This blog is advertising material and does not create an attorney client relationship, nor does it constitute legal advice. Everyone’s situation is different and the question of whether or not you have a claim will vary on a case-by-case basis. In contingent representation, clients may still be liable for costs.