Victor Dandridge from Charlottesville, Virginia Barred From Securities Industry
Have you lost money with financial advisor Victor M. Dandridge III of Charlottesville, Virginia? We are investigating allegations made by FINRA (the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority), against Victor Dandridge. FINRA barred Victor Dandridge from the securities industry after he failed to respond to an investigation. FINRA was investigating Dandridge regarding allegations that he stole over $3 million from a widow. Dandridge was also accused of converting $100,000 from a fraternity at the University of Virginia.
Victor Dandridge was a financial advisor and registered representative of Thompson Davis & Co. from February 2012 to July 2016. He worked at a branch office in Charlottesville, Virginia. Dandridge has been the subject of one customer complaint, filed in state court in Richmond County, Virginia.
Brokerage firms like Thompson Davis & Co. have a responsibility to adequately supervise all representatives who are registered through their firm. Brokerage firms also must take steps to ensure that their financial advisors follow all securities rules and regulations, as well as internal firm policies. When brokerage firms fail to adequately supervise their registered representatives, they may be liable for investment losses sustained by customers.
Israels & Neuman PLC is a securities and investment fraud law firm with offices in Denver, Colorado; and the Seattle area. We represent investors in FINRA arbitration proceedings in all 50 states, including investors in Virginia. Our attorneys have represented over one thousand investors against many brokerage firms in the past.
Click to view: Dandridge, Victor FINRA AWC
Click to view: Dandridge, Victor BrokerCheck 11.14.17
If you lost money with Victor Dandridge or Thompson Davis & Co., please CONTACT US at 720-599-3505 for a free evaluation of your case.
Israels & Neuman, PLC is a private law firm and is not affiliated with any government or law enforcement agency. Any investigation referenced in this blog is independent in nature and is being conducted by our law firm privately, not in conjunction with any government or law enforcement agency. All information contained in this blog should be deemed statements of opinion derived from the author’s review of public records, not statements of fact. This blog is advertising material and does not create an attorney client relationship, nor does it constitute legal advice. Everyone’s situation is different and the question of whether or not you have a claim will vary on a case-by-case basis. In contingent representation, clients may still be liable for costs.